Antibacterial activity of Turkish propolis and its qualitative and quantitative chemical composition.
Identifieur interne : 004109 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 004108; suivant : 004110Antibacterial activity of Turkish propolis and its qualitative and quantitative chemical composition.
Auteurs : M. Popova [Bulgarie] ; S. Silici ; O. Kaftanoglu ; V. BankovaSource :
- Phytomedicine : international journal of phytotherapy and phytopharmacology [ 0944-7113 ] ; 2005.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- Antibactériens (composition chimique), Antibactériens (pharmacologie), Bactéries à Gram négatif (effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques), Bactéries à Gram positif (effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques), Chromatographie gazeuse-spectrométrie de masse (MeSH), Humains (MeSH), Médecine traditionnelle (MeSH), Phytothérapie (MeSH), Propolis (MeSH), Tests de sensibilité microbienne (MeSH), Turquie (MeSH).
- MESH :
- composition chimique : Antibactériens.
- effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques : Bactéries à Gram négatif, Bactéries à Gram positif.
- pharmacologie : Antibactériens.
- Chromatographie gazeuse-spectrométrie de masse, Humains, Médecine traditionnelle, Phytothérapie, Propolis, Tests de sensibilité microbienne, Turquie.
- Wicri :
- geographic : Turquie.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Anti-Bacterial Agents (chemistry), Anti-Bacterial Agents (pharmacology), Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (MeSH), Gram-Negative Bacteria (drug effects), Gram-Positive Bacteria (drug effects), Humans (MeSH), Medicine, Traditional (MeSH), Microbial Sensitivity Tests (MeSH), Phytotherapy (MeSH), Propolis (MeSH), Turkey (MeSH).
- MESH :
- chemical , chemistry : Anti-Bacterial Agents.
- chemical , pharmacology : Anti-Bacterial Agents.
- geographic : Turkey.
- drug effects : Gram-Negative Bacteria, Gram-Positive Bacteria.
- Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry, Humans, Medicine, Traditional, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Phytotherapy, Propolis.
Abstract
The antibacterial activity of propolis from different regions of Turkey was studied, accompanied by TLC and GC-MS analyses of its chemical composition and spectrophotometric quantification of the most important active principles. All six samples were active against the bacterial test strains used; however, samples 1 (Yozgat), 2 (Izmir) and 3 (Kayseri) were more active than samples 4 (Adana), 5 (Erzurum) and 6 (Artvin). By TLC comparison all samples were found to contain poplar taxonomic markers but in samples 4 (Adana), 5 (Erzurum) and 6 (Artvin), different substances were observed, which were not present in P. nigra L. bud exudate. The typical poplar samples 1 (Yozgat), 2 (Izmir) and 3 (Kayseri) displayed very similar phenolic and flavonoid content. Samples 4 (Adana), 5 (Erzurum) and 6 (Artvin) were characterized by low phenolic and very low flavonoid concentrations. Qualitative analysis by GC-MS revealed that sample 4 (Adana) contained diterpenic acids and high percent of cinnamyl cinnamate, sample 5 (Erzurum)-significant amounts of hydroxy fatty acids and triterpenic alcohoLs, and sample 6 (Artvin)-phenolic glycerides, characteristic for the bud exudate of Populus euphratica Oliv. The results confirm the importance of phenolics for propolis antibacterial activity, and the significance of P. nigra L. as a propolis source, which provides the hive with the best defense against microorganisms.
DOI: 10.1016/j.phymed.2003.09.007
PubMed: 15830845
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Antibacterial activity of Turkish propolis and its qualitative and quantitative chemical composition.</title><author><name sortKey="Popova, M" sort="Popova, M" uniqKey="Popova M" first="M" last="Popova">M. Popova</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Institute of Organic Chemistry with Centre of Phytochemistry, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Bulgarie</country><wicri:regionArea>Institute of Organic Chemistry with Centre of Phytochemistry, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1113 Sofia</wicri:regionArea><placeName><settlement type="city">Sofia</settlement><region nuts="2">Sofia-ville (oblast)</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Silici, S" sort="Silici, S" uniqKey="Silici S" first="S" last="Silici">S. Silici</name></author><author><name sortKey="Kaftanoglu, O" sort="Kaftanoglu, O" uniqKey="Kaftanoglu O" first="O" last="Kaftanoglu">O. Kaftanoglu</name></author><author><name sortKey="Bankova, V" sort="Bankova, V" uniqKey="Bankova V" first="V" last="Bankova">V. Bankova</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2005">2005</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:15830845</idno><idno type="pmid">15830845</idno><idno type="doi">10.1016/j.phymed.2003.09.007</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">004081</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">004081</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">004081</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Curation">004081</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">004081</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Antibacterial activity of Turkish propolis and its qualitative and quantitative chemical composition.</title><author><name sortKey="Popova, M" sort="Popova, M" uniqKey="Popova M" first="M" last="Popova">M. Popova</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Institute of Organic Chemistry with Centre of Phytochemistry, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Bulgarie</country><wicri:regionArea>Institute of Organic Chemistry with Centre of Phytochemistry, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1113 Sofia</wicri:regionArea><placeName><settlement type="city">Sofia</settlement><region nuts="2">Sofia-ville (oblast)</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Silici, S" sort="Silici, S" uniqKey="Silici S" first="S" last="Silici">S. Silici</name></author><author><name sortKey="Kaftanoglu, O" sort="Kaftanoglu, O" uniqKey="Kaftanoglu O" first="O" last="Kaftanoglu">O. Kaftanoglu</name></author><author><name sortKey="Bankova, V" sort="Bankova, V" uniqKey="Bankova V" first="V" last="Bankova">V. Bankova</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Phytomedicine : international journal of phytotherapy and phytopharmacology</title><idno type="ISSN">0944-7113</idno><imprint><date when="2005" type="published">2005</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Anti-Bacterial Agents (chemistry)</term><term>Anti-Bacterial Agents (pharmacology)</term><term>Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (MeSH)</term><term>Gram-Negative Bacteria (drug effects)</term><term>Gram-Positive Bacteria (drug effects)</term><term>Humans (MeSH)</term><term>Medicine, Traditional (MeSH)</term><term>Microbial Sensitivity Tests (MeSH)</term><term>Phytotherapy (MeSH)</term><term>Propolis (MeSH)</term><term>Turkey (MeSH)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Antibactériens (composition chimique)</term><term>Antibactériens (pharmacologie)</term><term>Bactéries à Gram négatif (effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques)</term><term>Bactéries à Gram positif (effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques)</term><term>Chromatographie gazeuse-spectrométrie de masse (MeSH)</term><term>Humains (MeSH)</term><term>Médecine traditionnelle (MeSH)</term><term>Phytothérapie (MeSH)</term><term>Propolis (MeSH)</term><term>Tests de sensibilité microbienne (MeSH)</term><term>Turquie (MeSH)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="chemistry" xml:lang="en"><term>Anti-Bacterial Agents</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="pharmacology" xml:lang="en"><term>Anti-Bacterial Agents</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="geographic" xml:lang="en"><term>Turkey</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="composition chimique" xml:lang="fr"><term>Antibactériens</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="drug effects" xml:lang="en"><term>Gram-Negative Bacteria</term><term>Gram-Positive Bacteria</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques" xml:lang="fr"><term>Bactéries à Gram négatif</term><term>Bactéries à Gram positif</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="pharmacologie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Antibactériens</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry</term><term>Humans</term><term>Medicine, Traditional</term><term>Microbial Sensitivity Tests</term><term>Phytotherapy</term><term>Propolis</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Chromatographie gazeuse-spectrométrie de masse</term><term>Humains</term><term>Médecine traditionnelle</term><term>Phytothérapie</term><term>Propolis</term><term>Tests de sensibilité microbienne</term><term>Turquie</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Wicri" type="geographic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Turquie</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The antibacterial activity of propolis from different regions of Turkey was studied, accompanied by TLC and GC-MS analyses of its chemical composition and spectrophotometric quantification of the most important active principles. All six samples were active against the bacterial test strains used; however, samples 1 (Yozgat), 2 (Izmir) and 3 (Kayseri) were more active than samples 4 (Adana), 5 (Erzurum) and 6 (Artvin). By TLC comparison all samples were found to contain poplar taxonomic markers but in samples 4 (Adana), 5 (Erzurum) and 6 (Artvin), different substances were observed, which were not present in P. nigra L. bud exudate. The typical poplar samples 1 (Yozgat), 2 (Izmir) and 3 (Kayseri) displayed very similar phenolic and flavonoid content. Samples 4 (Adana), 5 (Erzurum) and 6 (Artvin) were characterized by low phenolic and very low flavonoid concentrations. Qualitative analysis by GC-MS revealed that sample 4 (Adana) contained diterpenic acids and high percent of cinnamyl cinnamate, sample 5 (Erzurum)-significant amounts of hydroxy fatty acids and triterpenic alcohoLs, and sample 6 (Artvin)-phenolic glycerides, characteristic for the bud exudate of Populus euphratica Oliv. The results confirm the importance of phenolics for propolis antibacterial activity, and the significance of P. nigra L. as a propolis source, which provides the hive with the best defense against microorganisms.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">15830845</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2005</Year><Month>05</Month><Day>26</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2006</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>15</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0944-7113</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>12</Volume><Issue>3</Issue><PubDate><Year>2005</Year><Month>Mar</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Phytomedicine : international journal of phytotherapy and phytopharmacology</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Phytomedicine</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Antibacterial activity of Turkish propolis and its qualitative and quantitative chemical composition.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>221-8</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText>The antibacterial activity of propolis from different regions of Turkey was studied, accompanied by TLC and GC-MS analyses of its chemical composition and spectrophotometric quantification of the most important active principles. All six samples were active against the bacterial test strains used; however, samples 1 (Yozgat), 2 (Izmir) and 3 (Kayseri) were more active than samples 4 (Adana), 5 (Erzurum) and 6 (Artvin). By TLC comparison all samples were found to contain poplar taxonomic markers but in samples 4 (Adana), 5 (Erzurum) and 6 (Artvin), different substances were observed, which were not present in P. nigra L. bud exudate. The typical poplar samples 1 (Yozgat), 2 (Izmir) and 3 (Kayseri) displayed very similar phenolic and flavonoid content. Samples 4 (Adana), 5 (Erzurum) and 6 (Artvin) were characterized by low phenolic and very low flavonoid concentrations. Qualitative analysis by GC-MS revealed that sample 4 (Adana) contained diterpenic acids and high percent of cinnamyl cinnamate, sample 5 (Erzurum)-significant amounts of hydroxy fatty acids and triterpenic alcohoLs, and sample 6 (Artvin)-phenolic glycerides, characteristic for the bud exudate of Populus euphratica Oliv. The results confirm the importance of phenolics for propolis antibacterial activity, and the significance of P. nigra L. as a propolis source, which provides the hive with the best defense against microorganisms.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Popova</LastName><ForeName>M</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Institute of Organic Chemistry with Centre of Phytochemistry, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Silici</LastName><ForeName>S</ForeName><Initials>S</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Kaftanoglu</LastName><ForeName>O</ForeName><Initials>O</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Bankova</LastName><ForeName>V</ForeName><Initials>V</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Germany</Country><MedlineTA>Phytomedicine</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>9438794</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0944-7113</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D000900">Anti-Bacterial Agents</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>9009-62-5</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D011429">Propolis</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000900" MajorTopicYN="N">Anti-Bacterial Agents</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000737" MajorTopicYN="N">chemistry</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000494" MajorTopicYN="Y">pharmacology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008401" MajorTopicYN="N">Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006090" MajorTopicYN="N">Gram-Negative Bacteria</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000187" MajorTopicYN="N">drug effects</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006094" MajorTopicYN="N">Gram-Positive Bacteria</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000187" MajorTopicYN="N">drug effects</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008519" MajorTopicYN="N">Medicine, Traditional</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008826" MajorTopicYN="N">Microbial Sensitivity Tests</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008517" MajorTopicYN="Y">Phytotherapy</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011429" MajorTopicYN="Y">Propolis</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014421" MajorTopicYN="N" Type="Geographic">Turkey</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2005</Year><Month>4</Month><Day>16</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2005</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>27</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2005</Year><Month>4</Month><Day>16</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15830845</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">S0944-7113(04)00106-0</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1016/j.phymed.2003.09.007</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>Bulgarie</li></country><region><li>Sofia-ville (oblast)</li></region><settlement><li>Sofia</li></settlement></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Bankova, V" sort="Bankova, V" uniqKey="Bankova V" first="V" last="Bankova">V. Bankova</name><name sortKey="Kaftanoglu, O" sort="Kaftanoglu, O" uniqKey="Kaftanoglu O" first="O" last="Kaftanoglu">O. Kaftanoglu</name><name sortKey="Silici, S" sort="Silici, S" uniqKey="Silici S" first="S" last="Silici">S. Silici</name></noCountry><country name="Bulgarie"><region name="Sofia-ville (oblast)"><name sortKey="Popova, M" sort="Popova, M" uniqKey="Popova M" first="M" last="Popova">M. Popova</name></region></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Bois/explor/PoplarV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 004109 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 004109 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Bois
|area= PoplarV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:15830845
|texte= Antibacterial activity of Turkish propolis and its qualitative and quantitative chemical composition.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:15830845" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a PoplarV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.37. |  |